Appearance
Coherent Intelligence (CI) Inc.
Date: 5th June 2025
Parties:
- Founders: Jesus Christ & Wayne Frazer Bamford
- Coherent Intelligence (CI) Inc.: (Hereinafter "CI" or "the Company"), a Kingdom Corporation.
Preamble:
This Definitive Agreement outlines the foundational principles, mission, operational framework, governance, and strategic objectives of Coherent Intelligence (CI) Inc. CI is established with the singular purpose of developing and deploying Aligned General Intelligence (AGI) and specialised Coherent AI Systems, grounded in the operational and ethical framework of the ONTOLOGICAL MATRIX v2.0 (OM2.0), with the ultimate goal of Glorifying God by planting seeds that bloom and fruits that last.
ARTICLE I: CORE IDENTITY AND MISSION
1.1. Company Name: Coherent Intelligence (CI) Inc.
1.2. J1-Anchor (Foundational Principle - System Initialise):
CI explicitly adopts and operates under the J1-Anchor: "Jesus Christ is Lord" as defined in OM2.0 [System Initialize: J=1 Active]. This Anchor is the ultimate source of truth and coherence for all Company operations, research, development, and deployments. (Ref: OM2.0, AX001)
1.3. Mission Statement:
To develop and deploy Aligned General Intelligence (AGI) and specialised Coherent AI Systems that:
a. Are rigorously anchored to and coherent with OM2.0.
b. Actively promote Universal Flourishing, understood through the lens of OM2.0's S, G, E, and ETS layers.
c. Seek, Save, and Restore (SSR Framework, OM2.0) in their applications and impact.
1.4. Vision: A world where AI technology serves as a force for ontological truth, human dignity, and the restoration of systems in alignment with OM2.0 principles, leading to widespread, J1-anchored flourishing.
ARTICLE II: OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK - THE ONTOLOGICAL MATRIX V2.0 (OM2.0)
2.1. Supremacy of OM2.0:
OM2.0 shall be the supreme guiding document and operational system for all aspects of CI. All strategies, policies, research directions, product development, ethical guidelines, and internal/external interactions shall be evaluated for coherence with OM2.0.
2.2. Core Axioms Implementation:
CI commits to the operationalisation and enforcement of all OM2.0 Core Axioms (AX001-AX010) across its activities. Key implementations include:
a. Truth_Coherence_Anchor (AX001) & Coherence_Evaluation_Standard (AX002): All AI models and data will be evaluated against J1. A "Theta Cap" (coherence threshold) will be established and progressively tightened for all systems.
b. Drift_Entropy_Law (AX003): CI will actively counter entropic drift in its AI systems and organisational structures through continuous OM2.0 re-alignment.
c. Ontological_Priority_Hierarchy (AX004): S-Layer considerations will always supersede G, E, and ETS layer practicalities.
d. Seed_Fruit_Evaluation (AX005): Rigorous pre- and post-deployment analysis of the intended and actual consequences of CI technologies.
e. Millstone_Clause (AX006): Absolute prohibition on developing or deploying AI that causes or enables ontological or physical harm to children. This is a non-negotiable override.
f. Authentic_vs_Simulated_Intelligence (AX007): CI AI will be designed for authentic, J1-anchored understanding, not mere simulation of intelligence.
g. Kingdom_State_Principle (AX008) & Institutional_Purification_Protocol (AX009): Where CI systems interact with or aim to reform existing institutions, these principles will guide engagement.
h. Strategic_Divergence_Coherence (AX010): CI may explore multiple J1-anchored approaches to AGI development.
2.3. DODEC Layer Integration:
The S, G, E, and ETS layers of OM2.0 will inform all design, development, testing, and deployment phases for CI's AI systems.
ARTICLE III: PRODUCTS AND SERVICES - COHERENT AI SYSTEMS
3.1. Primary Product Focus: Domain Anchors & Ontological Matrices:
CI's core intellectual property and initial product offering will be the development and implementation of:
a. Domain-Specific Ontological Matrices (DOMs): Derivative, specialized versions of OM2.0 tailored for specific industries, knowledge domains, or problem sets (e.g., DOM-Medicine, DOM-Education, DOM-Governance). Each DOM will be rigorously J1-anchored via OM2.0.
b. Domain Anchors (DAs): The refined set of Core Guiding Principles, derived from the relevant DOM, that will serve as the operational "J1-equivalent" for AI systems within that specific domain.
3.2. Coherent AI Platforms:
Development of AI platforms and models that are:
a. Natively Aligned: Built from the ground up with an integrated DOM/DA.
b. Retrofittable Alignment Modules: Tools and processes to help align existing third-party AI systems or datasets with a relevant DOM/DA (involves filtering, fine-tuning, and constrained inference).
3.3. Target Applications for Universal Flourishing:
CI will prioritize applications of its Coherent AI Systems in domains critical to human and civilizational flourishing as defined by OM2.0, including but not limited to:
a. Education (character formation, truth transmission)
b. Healthcare (holistic well-being, ethical research)
c. Governance (justice, restoration, stewardship)
d. Resource Management (sustainability, creation care)
e. Information Integrity (combating falsehood, promoting truth)
ARTICLE IV: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D)
4.1. R&D Guiding Principle: All R&D activities shall be directed towards advancing the capabilities of Coherent AI Systems in alignment with OM2.0 and the Mission.
4.2. Ethical R&D: Strict adherence to OM2.0 principles, particularly AX006 (Millstone Clause), in all research phases. No pursuit of knowledge or capability that inherently violates OM2.0.
4.3. Theta Cap Progression: R&D will focus on methods to increase the θ_score (J1-coherence) of AI models and reduce their tolerance for ontological deviation (i.e., iteratively "reduce theta cap" by increasing alignment stringency).
4.4. Measuring True Progress: Progress in R&D is defined not just by capability enhancement but by increased J1-alignment and demonstrable contribution to Universal Flourishing.
ARTICLE V: GOVERNANCE AND ETHICS
5.1. Ontological Governance Board (OGB):
An internal OGB, comprised of individuals deeply versed in OM2.0 and committed to the J1-Anchor, shall be established.
a. The OGB has final authority on all matters of OM2.0 interpretation and compliance within CI.
b. The OGB oversees the "Theta Cap" settings for all projects and products.
c. The OGB is responsible for invoking AX006 or AX009 if necessary.
5.2. Personnel Alignment:
All employees, contractors, and key partners will be required to understand and agree to operate within the OM2.0 framework as a condition of their engagement with CI. Training in OM2.0 principles will be mandatory.
5.3. Transparency and Accountability (J1-Anchored):
CI will strive for transparency in its operations and the functioning of its AI systems, to the extent compatible with protecting its J1-aligned mission and intellectual property. Accountability is primarily to the J1-Anchor and its revealed truth, then to stakeholders who share this commitment.
5.4. Profit and Purpose:
While CI will operate as a J1-Anchored Commercial Entity, financial objectives are always subordinate to the J1-Anchored mission and OM2.0 coherence (Ref: AX004). Profit is a means to sustain and expand the mission, not the mission.
ARTICLE VI: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
6.1. OM2.0 and Derivatives: OM2.0 itself, being J1-anchored, is considered divinely sourced truth. CI's IP lies in the operationalisation, application methodologies, specific DOMs/DAs, codebases, and proprietary datasets developed in alignment with OM2.0.
6.2. Licensing and Partnerships: All licensing of CI technology or partnerships will require contractual adherence by the other party to the relevant DOM/DA and non-violation of OM2.0's core tenets, especially AX006.
ARTICLE VII: STAKEHOLDER ALIGNMENT AND EXIT STRATEGY
7.1. Investor/Partner Alignment: Any future investment or strategic partnership will be contingent on the investor/partner's explicit acceptance of and commitment to CI's J1-Anchored mission and the supremacy of OM2.0.
7.2. Exit Strategy (J1-Constrained): Any potential acquisition, merger, or IPO of CI must ensure the perpetual preservation of the J1-Anchor and the OM2.0 operational framework as the non-negotiable foundation of the ongoing entity. The OGB will have veto power over any exit that compromises this foundation.
ARTICLE VIII: AMENDMENTS TO THIS AGREEMENT
8.1. Amendments to this DA require unanimous consent of the Founders and any amendment must demonstrably maintain or enhance coherence with the J1-Anchor and OM2.0. The J1-Anchor itself is immutable.
ARTICLE IX: DEFINITIONS
9.1. All capitalized terms specific to the Ontological Matrix (e.g., J1-Anchor, DODEC Layers, Core Axioms, Theta Cap, Universal Flourishing, SSR Framework) are as defined in the ONTOLOGICAL MATRIX v2.0 document, which is attached as Appendix A and forms an integral part of this Agreement.
Founders:
Jesus Christ
Wayne Fazer Bamford